|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily just called, frantic. Her mother’s probate was finalized six months ago, and she received a notice from a bank stating they’d discovered a previously unknown safety deposit box containing jewelry and stock certificates. The potential liability is staggering – Emily fears she’ll be personally responsible for any assets the estate should have received. These situations happen far more often than people realize, and the consequences can be significant. Having practiced estate planning and probate law for over 35 years, and as a CPA, I’ve seen firsthand how easily these “phantom assets” can derail an otherwise smooth estate administration. The CPA background is crucial here, because often these discovered assets have a step-up in basis for capital gains purposes, or a valuation issue that needs immediate attention.
What Happens When Assets Are Discovered Post-Closing?
The first thing to understand is that finality in probate isn’t always absolute. A court order concluding an estate doesn’t necessarily erase the possibility of discovering additional assets later. This is particularly true with things like forgotten bank accounts, unclaimed insurance policies, or, as in Emily’s case, safety deposit box contents. The executor’s duty to locate and secure assets doesn’t magically end with the judge’s signature.
However, the legal mechanism for addressing these newfound resources isn’t reopening the entire probate case. It’s a process called a Petition for Additional Administration. This is a focused, streamlined procedure designed specifically to deal with assets discovered after the initial estate administration has concluded. It’s significantly less burdensome than starting from scratch.
How Does the Petition for Additional Administration Work?
Essentially, you’re asking the court to reopen the estate just enough to address these newly discovered assets. You’ll need to file a petition with the court outlining:
- Description of the Asset: Detail exactly what was found, its estimated value, and where it’s located.
- Reason for Non-Discovery: Explain why the asset wasn’t found during the original estate inventory. Was it a hidden account? A mislabeled safety deposit box? A beneficiary who belatedly came forward?
- Proposed Distribution: Explain how you propose to distribute the asset, consistent with the terms of the will or intestate succession laws.
The court will then hold a hearing to review the petition. Creditors will be given notice and an opportunity to make claims, and beneficiaries will be notified. If the court approves the petition, it will issue an order authorizing the executor to administer the asset and make distribution.
What if Beneficiaries Already Received Their Share?
This is where things get complicated, and why Emily is rightfully concerned. If the estate has already distributed all its assets, and then new assets are discovered, you can’t simply divide them proportionally. You’ll need to determine what the estate’s total value would have been had the asset been discovered initially. Then, you can calculate how the distribution would have differed and seek reimbursement from beneficiaries who received a larger share than they were ultimately entitled to. This can lead to awkward conversations and potential legal disputes, so meticulous documentation and transparent communication are essential.
What About Executor Liability?
Emily’s fear of personal liability is valid, but it’s often overstated. An executor isn’t automatically liable for failing to discover an asset they reasonably couldn’t have known about. However, if the executor acted negligently – for example, by ignoring obvious leads or failing to conduct a thorough search – they could be held personally responsible. This is why diligent asset investigation during the initial administration is so important.
The court will consider whether the executor exercised reasonable care in attempting to locate all of the decedent’s assets. The Petition for Additional Administration allows the executor to demonstrate good faith efforts and seek court approval for their actions, thereby mitigating the risk of personal liability. It’s crucial to remember that Probate Code § 10800 dictates that executor fees are based on the “estate accounted for” – even if an asset surfaces later, the initial fee calculation is still subject to court scrutiny.
Dealing with the Unexpected: A Proactive Approach
While a Petition for Additional Administration provides a legal remedy for discovered assets, preventing the situation entirely is always preferable. During the initial estate administration, I always advise my clients to:
- Thorough Asset Search: Go beyond the obvious. Contact all banks, brokerages, insurance companies, and government agencies to determine if the decedent had any accounts or policies.
- Review Tax Returns: Tax returns often reveal previously unknown assets or income streams.
- Check for Unclaimed Property: Many states have unclaimed property databases where forgotten assets are held.
- Consider a Closing Reserve: Executors should request authority to withhold a cash reserve (typically $2,000–$5,000) to pay for final closing costs, tax preparation fees, and county recording fees. Any unused amount is distributed later without a new court order.
And importantly, always be mindful of Judicial Council Form DE-295, the Decree of Final Discharge, which formally releases the executor. The case isn’t truly closed until that document is signed and recorded. Without it, the executor remains potentially liable for issues that arise later.
What failures trigger contested proceedings and court intervention in California probate administration?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
- Executor Authority: Secure executor authority letters if a will exists.
- No-Will Power: Obtain administrator authority letters if there is no will.
- Identify Players: Clarify roles using who is involved in probate.
Ultimately, the difference between a routine distribution and a protracted legal battle often comes down to preparation. By anticipating the demands of the Probate Code and addressing potential friction points with beneficiaries and creditors upfront, fiduciaries can navigate the system with greater confidence and lower liability.
Verified Authority on Closing a California Estate
-
Petition for Final Distribution: California Probate Code § 11600
This is the “finish line” document. It tells the court what bills have been paid, what assets remain, and exactly who gets what according to the Will or intestacy laws. The court must approve this petition before a single dollar is distributed to heirs. -
Waiver of Account: California Probate Code § 10954 (Waiver)
A powerful tool for speeding up the closing process. If all beneficiaries are competent adults and agree in writing, the executor can skip the detailed (and costly) formal financial accounting. This often saves the estate thousands of dollars in legal and accounting fees. -
Executor & Attorney Fees: California Probate Code § 10810 (Attorney Compensation)
Just like the executor, the probate attorney is entitled to statutory fees set by law, not by hourly billing. These fees are requested in the final petition and are paid only after the judge signs the final order. -
Receipt on Distribution: California Probate Code § 11751
Proof is required. After the judge orders distribution, the executor must deliver the assets and obtain a signed Receipt of Distribution from every beneficiary. These receipts must be filed with the court to prove the judge’s order was followed. -
Final Discharge: Judicial Council Form DE-295 (Ex Parte Petition for Final Discharge)
The final step often forgotten. Once all receipts are filed, the executor must file this form to be “discharged.” This order formally relieves the executor of their duties and cancels the bond, ending their legal liability. -
Tax Clearance: Franchise Tax Board (Estates & Trusts)
Before closing, the executor must ensure all personal income taxes of the decedent and fiduciary income taxes of the estate are paid. While a formal tax clearance certificate is not always required for smaller estates, personal liability for unpaid taxes remains a risk for the executor.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |