This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Emily just lost everything. Her mother’s estate was relatively small – a house, a car, a modest brokerage account – but Emily was counting on it to help with her daughter’s college tuition. She’d received the Notice of Petition indicating her uncle was attempting to invalidate the Will, claiming undue influence. Emily, understandably panicked, showed up to court hoping to verbally explain to the judge why the Will was valid and that her uncle was simply disgruntled he wasn’t left more money. The judge, however, cut her off, stating that objections needed to be in writing and continued the hearing. Emily’s hearing was continued, costing her valuable time and legal fees, and adding immense stress during an already difficult time. She could have avoided this entirely with a simple understanding of the rules of probate objection.
As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Escondido, California, I’ve seen this scenario play out countless times. People assume probate court operates like television courtroom dramas, where you can sway the judge with a well-delivered argument. While passion and truth are important, probate has very specific procedural rules, and failing to follow them can have devastating consequences. My CPA background uniquely positions me to understand the tax implications of estate issues – crucial for maximizing the benefit of the estate and minimizing capital gains exposure. Understanding the step-up in basis rules, for example, can save families significant amounts in taxes. But first, you have to get to the point of discussing those benefits.
Can I Object Orally in Probate Court?
The short answer is yes, initially. However, understanding the scope of that “yes” is critical. You do not need to file a lengthy, lawyer-drafted legal brief to raise your concerns at the first hearing. Probate Code § 1043 specifically allows you to appear and object orally. The court must then pause proceedings and grant you a continuance – usually 30 days – to file your written objection. This provides a crucial first layer of protection, stopping the process even if you’re unprepared to fully litigate the matter.
But don’t mistake that initial oral objection for a complete victory. It merely buys you time. The court isn’t making a ruling on the merits of your objection at that first hearing. It’s simply acknowledging that you have a dispute and that you deserve an opportunity to formally present your case in writing.
What Happens If I Don’t File a Written Objection?
If you object orally and the judge grants a continuance, failing to file your written objection within the allotted time is often fatal to your case. The court can, and likely will, proceed with the petition as if you had no objections. It’s tempting to think you can address issues verbally later, but that’s a dangerous gamble.
This is especially true if the petition involves complex issues like challenges to the validity of a trust, disputes over asset valuation, or allegations of financial abuse. These require a carefully crafted legal argument supported by evidence, not just a heartfelt plea. A proper written objection, prepared by an attorney, outlines your legal position, cites relevant case law and statutes, and presents evidence to support your claims.
What Evidence Should I Prepare for the Hearing?
Often, clients mistakenly believe probate hearings are like television trials with live witnesses. This isn’t usually the case. Probate Code § 1022 states that standard probate hearings typically accept an affidavit or verified petition as evidence. If you want to call a witness to testify, the judge will likely continue the matter to a dedicated “Evidentiary Hearing” or trial date, giving the opposing party time to prepare for cross-examination.
Therefore, focus on preparing a comprehensive affidavit or declaration that clearly and concisely outlines your position. Include any supporting documents, such as emails, letters, financial statements, or medical records. Remember, the goal is to present a compelling and persuasive case on paper.
What If the Hearing Is Scheduled and I Didn’t Receive Notice?
This is a critical issue. Probate Code § 1220 mandates that the petitioner must mail the Notice of Hearing (Form DE-120) to all interested persons at least 15 days prior. A missing or deficient “Proof of Service” in the court file will immediately stop the hearing. This is a non-waivable defect, meaning the judge has no discretion – they must strike the matter. It doesn’t matter if the petition is valid; if proper notice wasn’t given, the proceedings are flawed.
However, simply stating you didn’t receive notice isn’t enough. You need to demonstrate to the court that you were unaware of the hearing despite the petitioner’s obligation to provide notice. Evidence like an incorrect address on file or a claim that the mail was returned as undeliverable can be helpful.
What About the Final Order? Who Prepares It?
Many clients are frustrated when they win their case but leave court with no official order. California Rule of Court 3.1312 clarifies that the judge generally does not draft the order for you. The prevailing party is responsible for preparing the “Proposed Order” and lodging it with the court before the hearing.
If the judge grants your petition but there’s no Proposed Order in the file, you leave with nothing. This can create significant delays and complications down the line. It’s best practice to prepare a Proposed Order, even if you’re unsure whether it will be necessary, to ensure a smooth and efficient outcome.
Navigating probate court can be challenging, even for those with legal experience. Don’t risk losing your inheritance or facing unnecessary delays because of a procedural misstep. Consult with an experienced estate planning attorney to ensure your rights are protected and your case is presented effectively.
What separates an efficient California probate process from a drawn-out conflict over authority and assets?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
| Legal Foundation | Relevance |
|---|---|
| The Court | See the role of the probate court. |
| The Law | Review probate governing law. |
| Citations | Check legal authority in probate. |
California probate is most manageable when authority is documented early, assets are classified correctly, and procedure is followed consistently from petition through closing. When the process is approached with realistic expectations about notice, claims, accounting, and dispute risk, the estate is more likely to move toward closure without avoidable conflict or delay.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |