This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice.
Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship.
Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Emily just lost everything. After months of battling with her brother over their mother’s estate, she finally secured a hearing date to challenge the validity of a hastily-written codicil. She thought she had a strong case, but discovered a crucial piece of evidence after filing her Petition. The court wouldn’t let her introduce it – not without amending the Petition first. The hearing was next week, and the judge refused to continue the matter. Emily, devastated, faced losing her rightful inheritance simply because of a procedural misstep and a rigid court schedule. It cost her thousands in additional legal fees to scramble and attempt a last-minute amendment.
As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Escondido, I’ve seen this scenario play out far too often. Clients assume they can simply present new information at the hearing, but probate court operates on strict rules of evidence and procedure. Successfully navigating these rules often requires proactive adjustments to your filed Petition. The advantage of being a CPA, of course, is understanding the tax implications of these adjustments – like ensuring a proper step-up in basis for inherited assets, minimizing capital gains exposure, and accurate valuation of property.
Can I Change My Petition Right Before the Hearing?
The short answer is yes, but with significant limitations and risks. California law allows amendments to your Petition up to a certain point, but it’s not a free-for-all. The court wants to avoid surprise pleadings or evidence that would unfairly prejudice the opposing party. Generally, you can amend your Petition up until 10 days before the hearing, but any amendment must be directly related to the original claims and not fundamentally alter the nature of your case.
Significant changes – adding new causes of action, introducing entirely new allegations, or significantly altering your valuation of assets – are likely to be denied, especially if the opposing party objects. The court’s concern is ensuring fairness and providing adequate time for all parties to respond to the amended allegations. You must also file a “Notice of Amendment” and properly serve it on all interested parties. Failing to do so is a common mistake that can lead to the amendment being disregarded.
What Happens if I Find New Evidence After Filing?
Discovering new evidence is common in probate litigation. However, as Emily learned, simply revealing it at the hearing isn’t enough. You must formally incorporate it into your Petition through an amendment. The amendment should clearly state the new evidence and explain how it supports your claims. Be prepared to submit supporting documentation with your amended Petition.
If the evidence is particularly crucial or complex, consider requesting a continuance of the hearing to allow the opposing party sufficient time to review and respond. It’s better to ask for more time upfront than to risk having your evidence excluded entirely. Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75 now permanently allows for remote appearances in probate hearings, but does not override the need to properly amend pleadings.
What if the Other Side Disagrees with My Amendment?
The opposing party has the right to object to your amendment. If they do, the court will hold a hearing to determine whether the amendment should be allowed. The judge will consider factors such as the timing of the amendment, the extent of the changes, and whether the opposing party will be unfairly prejudiced.
The judge has broad discretion in these matters, so it’s crucial to present a compelling argument in favor of your amendment. Emphasize the importance of the new evidence or allegations and explain why it’s necessary to ensure a just outcome. Remember, the court wants to reach the correct result, but it also wants to maintain a fair and orderly process.
What if I Just Want to Clarify Something in My Petition?
Minor clarifications or corrections to your Petition generally won’t require a formal amendment. You can often address these issues during your opening statement at the hearing or through a brief written submission to the court. However, if the clarification involves a material fact or alters the legal basis of your claim, it’s best to err on the side of caution and file an amendment.
What if I Miss the Deadline to Amend?
Missing the deadline to amend your Petition can be devastating. If you do, the court may refuse to consider any evidence or arguments that weren’t included in the original filing. This is why it’s so important to act quickly when you discover new information or need to make changes to your Petition.
If you absolutely cannot meet the deadline, consider filing a motion for leave to amend, explaining the reasons for your delay and arguing that the amendment is necessary to ensure a fair hearing. However, be aware that the court is not required to grant your motion. It’s always best to be proactive and address any potential issues before the deadline passes. Probate Code § 1220 addresses notice of hearing requirements; ensure your amendment includes proper notice to all parties.
What About the Order Confirming the Hearing?
The judge generally does not write the order for you. The prevailing party is responsible for preparing the ‘Proposed Order’ and lodging it with the court before the hearing. If the judge grants your petition but there is no Order in the file to sign, you leave with nothing. California Rule of Court 3.1312 governs this process, and failing to prepare a proposed order can lead to significant delays.
How do enforcement rules in California probate court shape outcomes for heirs and fiduciaries?

Success in probate court depends less on the size of the estate and more on the accuracy of the petition and the behavior of the fiduciary. Whether the issue is a forgotten asset, a contested creditor claim, or a disagreement among siblings, understanding the procedural triggers for court intervention is the best defense against prolonged administration.
| Duty | Compliance Check |
|---|---|
| Core Duties | Review executor and administrator duties. |
| Bad Acts | Avoid fiduciary misconduct. |
| Protections | Understand rights of heirs. |
California probate is most manageable when authority is documented early, assets are classified correctly, and procedure is followed consistently from petition through closing. When the process is approached with realistic expectations about notice, claims, accounting, and dispute risk, the estate is more likely to move toward closure without avoidable conflict or delay.
Verified Authority on California Probate Hearings
-
Oral Objections (The “Stop” Button): California Probate Code § 1043
This is the most important statute for beneficiaries. It grants an interested person the right to appear at the hearing and object orally to the petition. Once an oral objection is made, the court generally must continue the hearing to allow time for written objections to be filed. -
Remote Appearances (Zoom/CourtCall): California Code of Civil Procedure § 367.75
Modern probate hearings are often hybrid. This code section governs the right to appear remotely. While convenient, note that the court can typically require a physical appearance for “evidentiary” hearings where witness credibility is being judged. -
Affidavits as Evidence: California Probate Code § 1022
Unlike criminal court, probate hearings rely heavily on paper. A verified petition or an affidavit is admissible as evidence in an uncontested probate hearing. This is why “clearing your notes” in writing is more important than your oral argument. -
Notice of Hearing Requirements: California Probate Code § 1220
The court’s jurisdiction depends on this. The petitioner must mail notice of the hearing at least 15 days in advance to all interested parties. If the “Proof of Service” is not filed or is defective, the judge cannot legally hold the hearing. -
Lodging the Proposed Order: California Rules of Court 3.1312
A common rookie mistake is showing up without the paperwork. The “Proposed Order” (the document the judge signs) should generally be lodged with the court before the hearing. If the judge approves your petition but has nothing to sign, your Letters cannot be issued. -
Proving the Will (Witnesses): California Probate Code § 8220
If a Will is contested, or if it is not “self-proving” (lacking a proper attestation clause), the court may require the testimony of a subscribing witness at the hearing to prove the Will is authentic.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |