|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
I recently received a frantic call from Bradley. His father had passed away unexpectedly, and Bradley was named executor of his estate. Bradley’s father’s Will clearly stated he wanted his beachfront home in Escondido to go to Bradley’s 16-year-old niece, Emily. However, Bradley was terrified because he didn’t know how to legally transfer ownership to a minor. He feared the potential for mismanagement of a valuable asset and the legal complications involved. This is a common concern, and thankfully, several well-defined options exist to protect both the property and the beneficiary.
What Happens When a Minor Inherits Real Estate in California?

California law doesn’t allow a minor to directly own real estate. A minor can be a beneficiary, but the property needs to be managed on their behalf until they reach the age of 18. The standard approach is through a court-appointed guardianship, but that often involves ongoing legal oversight and expense. As an estate planning attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience, I always advise clients to proactively avoid this scenario. The best solutions involve planning within the estate documents themselves.
How Can I Transfer a House to a Minor Without a Guardianship?
There are three primary methods to transfer real estate to a minor while protecting their interests: a trust, a custodial account under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), or, in certain circumstances, utilizing a Petition under AB 2016. Each has its own benefits and drawbacks. A trust is often the most comprehensive, allowing for detailed instructions on how and when the property should be used and managed. However, trusts can be more complex and expensive to establish. An UTMA account is simpler, but provides less control over the asset’s usage. The AB 2016 process, while streamlined, has very specific requirements.
Understanding the AB 2016 Probate Process for a Primary Residence
For deaths on or after April 1, 2025, California law allows for a simplified transfer of a primary residence valued up to $750,000 through a ‘Petition for Succession’ under AB 2016 (Probate Code § 13151). This is NOT an Affidavit, but a formal Petition requiring a Judge’s Order. This process is significantly faster and less expensive than traditional probate, but it’s crucial to understand the limitations. To qualify, the decedent’s other non-real estate assets (cash, stocks, etc.) typically must remain below the separate $208,850 Small Estate limit. It’s important to distinguish between the Small Estate Affidavit, strictly for real property <$69,625 like timeshares or vacant land, and this AB 2016 process.
The CPA Advantage: Step-Up in Basis and Tax Implications
As a CPA as well as an attorney, I emphasize the importance of considering the tax implications when transferring real estate. The house will receive a step-up in basis to its fair market value at the date of the decedent’s death, which can significantly reduce capital gains taxes if the property is later sold. Furthermore, proper valuation is critical for estate tax purposes, especially when dealing with high-value properties. I advise clients to proactively engage a qualified appraiser to establish an accurate valuation for their estate.
- Trusts: Offer maximum control and protection, but require initial setup costs and ongoing administration.
- UTMA Accounts: Simpler and less expensive, but offer less control over asset usage.
- AB 2016 Petition: Streamlined for qualifying primary residences, but has asset limitations.
While addressing this specific concern is vital, your entire estate plan relies on the enforceability of your Last Will and Testament.
As a dual-licensed CPA and Attorney, I warn clients that specific asset strategies are useless if the core Will fails to meet probate standards.
Below is a guide to the specific standards California judges use to determine if your estate plan is valid:
What makes a California will legally enforceable when it matters most?
In California, a last will and testament operates within a probate system that emphasizes intent, clarity, and procedural compliance. When properly drafted, a will does more than distribute property—it creates legally enforceable instructions that guide courts, fiduciaries, and beneficiaries through administration with fewer disputes and less uncertainty.
- Planning: Review future needs regularly.
- Law: Check statutory rules.
- Parties: Update testator details.
When a will is drafted with California probate review in mind, it becomes a stabilizing roadmap rather than a source of conflict. Clear intent, proper authority, and compliant execution protect both families and estates.
Resources for Asset Management & Transfer
-
Property Tax Reassessment: California State Board of Equalization (Prop 19)
This page details the “Base Year Value Transfer” rules. It explains that heirs can only avoid a property tax reassessment if the inherited home becomes their primary residence and a claim is filed within one year of the date of death. -
Real Estate Probate (AB 2016): California Probate Code § 13151 (Petition for Succession)
The specific statute for the AB 2016 process. It outlines the requirements for using a court-approved “Petition” (not an affidavit) to transfer a primary residence worth $750,000 or less (gross value) for deaths occurring after April 1, 2025. -
Small Estate Affidavit: California Probate Code § 13100 (Personal Property)
Access the statutory language for the “Small Estate Affidavit.” This procedure is strictly for Personal Property (cash, stocks, vehicles) and is limited to estates with a total value of $208,850 or less (effective April 1, 2025). -
Federal Estate Tax: IRS Estate Tax Guidelines
The authoritative federal resource for estate valuation. It reflects the 2026 exemption increase to $15 million per person established by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which is critical for high-net-worth asset planning. -
Unclaimed Assets: California State Controller – Unclaimed Property
The primary portal for executors and heirs to search for “lost” assets—such as forgotten bank accounts, uncashed dividends, and insurance benefits—that have been remitted to the State of California for safekeeping. -
Business/LLC Compliance: FinCEN – Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI)
The official portal for corporate transparency reporting. While many domestic U.S. LLCs received exemptions in 2025, executors managing foreign-registered entities or specific non-exempt structures must still consult this resource to ensure compliance.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |