|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily received a phone call from a process server three months after her mother’s funeral—and learned a major creditor was suing the estate, and personally naming her as executor, for $85,000 in unpaid medical bills. The shock was immense; she’d meticulously followed her aunt’s wishes, distributed the assets as directed, and assumed she was done. Now, she faced personal legal exposure, potential judgments, and a ruined credit score. This situation, sadly, is far more common than people realize.
As an Estate Planning Attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Escondido, California, I frequently advise clients on the nuances of estate administration, and particularly the potential liabilities for executors. It’s crucial to understand that while executors don’t personally own the estate’s debts, they have a fiduciary duty to manage them responsibly, and failing to do so can absolutely lead to personal financial repercussions. The good news is that many of these issues are avoidable with proper planning and execution.
What Debts Are We Talking About?
The debts an estate might face are varied. These include credit card debt, mortgages, auto loans, medical expenses, tax liabilities (both federal and state), and even personal injury claims. Understanding the nature of the debt is the first step. For example, a debt secured by a specific asset, like a house with a mortgage, is handled differently than an unsecured credit card balance. Furthermore, debts incurred after the date of death require special scrutiny, as they may not be enforceable against the estate.
How California Law Prioritizes Creditor Claims
California’s probate process operates under a strict payment order as defined in Probate Code § 11420. This code outlines the hierarchy of claims against an estate. Secured creditors – those with a lien on specific property – generally get paid first. Then come administrative expenses (like executor fees, attorney fees, and court costs). After that, priority claims, such as certain tax liabilities, are addressed. Unsecured creditors, like credit card companies, are typically last in line. It’s essential to know this order because improperly distributing assets before satisfying higher-priority creditors can create personal liability for the executor.
The Formal Creditor Claims Process
All claims against an estate must follow the formal claims system outlined in Probate Code §§ 9000–9399. This means creditors must file a written claim with the probate court within a specific timeframe—generally four months from the date of death. As executor, you are responsible for notifying potential creditors of the probate proceedings and providing them with the opportunity to file a claim. Ignoring this responsibility can lead to you being personally liable for the unpaid debt. We utilize a published notice in a local newspaper, direct notification to known creditors, and thorough examination of the deceased’s records to ensure complete compliance.
The One-Year Sword of Damocles
Even with proper notification, creditors have a hard one-year deadline to pursue legal action against the estate, as stipulated by CCP § 366.2. This timeframe begins from the date of death and is NOT tolled by the probate process. What that means is that even if the probate court hasn’t finalized asset distribution, a creditor can still sue within that year. Failing to defend the estate against a timely lawsuit can result in a default judgment against the estate—and potentially against you personally if you haven’t acted prudently.
Community Property and Spousal Liability
A common concern is whether a surviving spouse is liable for the debts of the deceased. The answer is complex. Debts incurred during the marriage are typically community property obligations, meaning both spouses are responsible. However, debts incurred solely by the deceased after the date of separation can be considered separate property obligations. Family Code § 910 and Probate Code §§ 13550–13554 further delineate the scope of spousal liability, capping statutory exposure in certain situations. A thorough evaluation of the debt’s origin and characterization is essential to determine the extent of potential spousal liability.
What About Small Estates?
California offers simplified probate procedures for smaller estates – currently defined as estates with assets totaling $208,850 or less for deaths on or after April 1, 2025 (Probate Code § 13100). While these procedures are less formal, they don’t eliminate the need to address creditor claims. Even in a small estate scenario, it’s vital to ensure debts are paid in the correct order and that distribution doesn’t occur before known creditors are satisfied.
Ultimately, the role of executor is a serious undertaking with real potential liabilities. Proactive estate planning—including a clear inventory of assets and debts, a well-drafted will, and experienced legal guidance—is the best defense against creditor claims and personal financial exposure. My firm’s CPA advantage allows us to accurately assess asset valuation, step-up in basis, and potential capital gains implications, minimizing tax liabilities and maximizing the estate’s value for your beneficiaries. Don’t navigate this complex process alone; seek professional counsel to protect yourself and honor the wishes of your loved one.
Strategic planning for this specific asset is important, but it must be supported by a Will that can withstand California judicial review.
In my Escondido practice, I frequently see “perfect” asset plans unravel because the base estate documents could not survive a court challenge.
To protect your family from unnecessary conflict, you must understand how judges evaluate the enforceability of your Will:
How do probate courts in California evaluate intent when a will is challenged?

In California, a last will and testament is reviewed under probate standards that focus on intent, capacity, and execution. Clear drafting reduces ambiguity, limits misinterpretation, and helps families avoid unnecessary conflict during estate administration.
- Planning: Review estate planning regularly.
- Validation: Check statutory rules.
- People: Update testator details.
When a will is drafted with California probate review in mind, it becomes a stabilizing roadmap rather than a source of conflict. Clear intent, proper authority, and compliant execution protect both families and estates.
Controlling California Statutes on Estate Debts and Creditor Claims
-
Debt Priority:
California Probate Code § 11420
Establishes the mandatory statutory order in which estate debts must be paid before any distributions to beneficiaries. -
Probate Creditor Claims:
California Probate Code §§ 9000–9399
Governs how creditor claims must be formally filed in probate and why informal demands, letters, or invoices are legally ineffective. -
Creditor Lawsuit Deadline:
California Code of Civil Procedure § 366.2
Imposes a strict one-year deadline from the date of death for most creditor lawsuits, which is not tolled by probate proceedings. -
Surviving Spouse Liability:
California Probate Code §§ 13550–13554
Limits a surviving spouse’s personal liability for a decedent’s debts to the value of property received under these statutes. -
Small Estate Threshold:
California Probate Code § 13100
Sets the $208,850 small estate affidavit threshold for deaths occurring on or after April 1, 2025.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd Escondido, CA 92123 (858) 278-2800
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |