|
Legal & Tax Disclosure
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client or professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change. You should consult a qualified professional regarding your specific circumstances. |
Emily just received a devastating phone call. Her mother passed away unexpectedly, leaving a living trust designed to protect her inheritance. But a debt collector is now threatening to sue the trust – and Emily – for a medical bill her mother incurred before her death. Emily is panicked, believing the entire purpose of the trust has been defeated, and faces potentially losing a substantial portion of what was meant for her future. It’s a scenario I see far too often, and the cost – financially and emotionally – can be significant.
As an Estate Planning Attorney and CPA with over 35 years of experience here in Escondido, I’ve guided countless clients through these challenges. The key to understanding whether creditors can reach assets held in a living trust isn’t a simple yes or no. It’s a nuanced issue that depends heavily on when the debt arose, the type of trust, and how the trust was administered. Being both an attorney and a CPA gives me a unique perspective, allowing me to not only structure trusts for asset protection but also understand the tax implications of creditor claims – including the crucial step-up in basis and potential capital gains issues.
Does a Revocable Trust Offer Creditor Protection?
Most living trusts are “revocable,” meaning the grantor (the person creating the trust) retains control and can amend or revoke it during their lifetime. Unfortunately, a revocable trust doesn’t offer significant protection from creditors while the grantor is still alive. This is because the grantor maintains ownership of the assets, and creditors can pursue those assets as they would any other asset owned by the individual. Think of it like a temporary holding pen – it doesn’t shield the assets from pre-death debts.
However, the picture changes dramatically after the grantor’s death. While a properly funded revocable trust avoids probate, it doesn’t automatically shield assets from all creditor claims. The executor (or trustee) still has a legal duty to address outstanding debts.
What Claims Can Creditors Bring Against a Trust?
Creditors can bring claims against a trust for debts that accrued before the grantor’s death. These claims fall into several categories:
- Contractual Debts: Credit card debt, loans, unpaid bills, and other agreements.
- Statutory Claims: Debts imposed by law, like unpaid taxes.
- Tort Claims: Claims arising from wrongful acts, such as personal injury lawsuits.
It’s critical to understand that these aren’t just theoretical possibilities. Probate Code § 9202 mandates that the executor has a mandatory duty to send specific notice to the Franchise Tax Board, Victim Compensation Board, and Medi-Cal (DHCS) within 90 days of appointment. Failure to notify these agencies pauses their statute of limitations, allowing them to claw back assets years later.
The Importance of the 4-Month Claims Period
After someone dies, creditors don’t have unlimited time to make claims. Probate Code § 9100 dictates a strict window for creditors to file a claim: either 4 months after Letters are issued or 60 days after notice is mailed (whichever is later). Once this period expires, unfiled claims are generally forever barred, protecting the heirs. This is why timely and proper notification to creditors is so important.
However, simply letting the 4-month period pass isn’t always enough to eliminate the risk.
What Happens if a Creditor Disputes a Claim?
If an executor rejects a creditor’s claim (using Form DE-174), the creditor has exactly 90 days to file a lawsuit in civil court. Probate Code § 9353 is clear on this – if they fail to sue within this window, the claim is legally dead. This is why careful documentation and a strong legal defense are crucial.
How Do Trusts Differ from Probate?
Understanding the difference between a trust and probate is essential. Probate is a court-supervised process for distributing assets through a will. It’s public record and subject to creditor claims. A trust, when properly funded, avoids this public process. However, as Emily’s situation highlights, avoiding probate doesn’t automatically equal avoiding creditors.
What About Irrevocable Trusts?
An “irrevocable” trust is different. Once established, the grantor generally gives up control of the assets. This can offer greater protection from creditors, both during the grantor’s life and after death. However, creating an irrevocable trust is a complex undertaking with significant tax implications. Any transfer to an irrevocable trust must be done carefully to avoid being considered a fraudulent conveyance.
Debts Bearing Interest: A Hidden Cost
Don’t forget that debts bear interest from the date of death (or the date the claim is allowed) at the rate of 10% per annum (unless the contract specifies otherwise), as outlined in Probate Code § 11423. Delaying payment unnecessarily drains the inheritance. As a CPA, I always advise prompt and efficient settlement of valid claims to minimize these costs.
Trust Claims vs. Probate Claims: A Key Distinction
While probate requires creditor notice, trusts do not automatically trigger this process. However, a trustee can opt-in to the claims procedure to cut off liability after 4 months, utilizing the Optional Trust Claims Procedure (Probate Code § 19000). Without this, creditors can theoretically sue the trust beneficiaries for up to 1 year after death (CCP § 366.2).
What causes California probate cases to spiral into delay, disputes, and extra cost?

California probate is designed to provide court-supervised transfer of property, yet cases often break down when authority is unclear, required steps are missed, or disputes arise over assets, notice, and fiduciary conduct. When the process is misunderstood, families can face avoidable delay, escalating conflict, and increased exposure to creditor issues, hearings, or litigation before the estate can close.
To close an estate cleanly, you must understand the requirements for how to close probate, prepare a detailed final accounting, and ensure the plan for final distribution is court-approved.
Ultimately, the difference between a routine distribution and a protracted legal battle often comes down to preparation. By anticipating the demands of the Probate Code and addressing potential friction points with beneficiaries and creditors upfront, fiduciaries can navigate the system with greater confidence and lower liability.
Verified Authority on Probate Creditor Claims
-
The Creditor Window (4-Month Rule): California Probate Code § 9100
This statute provides the primary protection for the estate. Generally, any creditor who fails to file a formal claim within four months of the executor receiving Letters is barred from collecting. This “clean break” is one of the main advantages of formal probate. -
Mandatory Notice to Public Agencies: California Probate Code § 9202
Regular creditors aren’t the only concern. You MUST send specific notices to the Director of Health Care Services (Medi-Cal), the Franchise Tax Board, and the Victim Compensation Board. Missing this step keeps the liability window open indefinitely for the state. -
Priority of Payments: California Probate Code § 11420 (Debt Hierarchy)
If an estate is “insolvent” (debts exceed assets), you cannot simply pay bills as they arrive. This code establishes the strict pecking order: funeral expenses and administration costs (lawyer/executor fees) get paid before credit cards and medical bills. -
Rejection of Claim (The “Sue or Lose It” Rule): California Probate Code § 9353
When an executor formally rejects a claim (Form DE-174), the clock starts ticking. The creditor has exactly 90 days to file a civil lawsuit to enforce the debt. If they miss this deadline, the claim is barred, regardless of its validity. -
Personal Liability of Executor: California Probate Code § 9601
An executor can be held personally liable for “breach of fiduciary duty” if they pay debts out of order (e.g., paying a credit card before the funeral home) or distribute assets to heirs before clearing all valid creditor claims. -
One-Year Statute of Limitations (Non-Probate): California Code of Civil Procedure § 366.2
This is the ultimate backstop. Even if no probate is opened, creditors generally only have one year from the date of death to file a lawsuit against the decedent’s successors (e.g., trust beneficiaries). After one year, most debts expire automatically.
|
Attorney Advertising, Legal Disclosure & Authorship
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. Under the California Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar advertising regulations, this material may be considered attorney advertising. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship or any professional advisory relationship. Laws vary by jurisdiction and are subject to change, including recent 2026 developments under California’s AB 2016 and evolving federal estate and reporting requirements. You should consult a qualified attorney or advisor regarding your specific circumstances before taking action.
Responsible Attorney:
Steven F. Bliss, California Attorney (Bar No. 147856).
Local Office:
Escondido Probate Law720 N Broadway 107 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 884-4044
Escondido Probate Law is a practice location and trade name used by Steven F. Bliss, Esq., a California-licensed attorney.
About the Author & Legal Review Process
This article was researched and drafted by the Legal Editorial Team of the Law Firm of Steven F. Bliss, Esq.,
a collective of attorneys, legal writers, and paralegals dedicated to translating complex legal concepts into clear, accurate guidance.
Legal Review:
This content was reviewed and approved by Steven F. Bliss, a California-licensed attorney (Bar No. 147856). Mr. Bliss concentrates his practice in estate planning and estate administration, advising clients on proactive planning strategies and representing fiduciaries in probate and trust administration proceedings when formal court involvement becomes necessary.
With more than 35 years of experience in California estate planning and estate administration,
Mr. Bliss focuses on structuring enforceable estate plans, guiding fiduciaries through court-supervised proceedings, resolving creditor and notice issues, and coordinating asset management to support compliant, timely distributions and reduce fiduciary risk. |